Discover new books on Goodreads. Sign in with Facebook Sign in options. Join Goodreads. None yet. Ross Archer Goodreads Author. Combine Editions. Ross Archer Average rating: 3. Ross Archer Goodreads Author ,. Lori Bohannon Ansley.
Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Lori Ansley Editor. Ross Archer Goodreads Author Editor ,.
- J. Ross Archer (Author of Surviving the Gauntlet)?
- COMMENTS (145).
- Japanese and Taiwanese Fiction, 1960-1990!
Lori B. Lori Bohannon Ansley ,. Britons are well aware of the limitations of their system. But do they appreciate having the N.
Like squabbling family members who band together against outside criticism, Britons have reacted to the barrage of American attacks on the N. The Twitter campaign is full of testimonials from recipients of successful treatment for brain abscesses, complicated pregnancies, mangled toes, liver disease, hernias, car accidents, nervous breakdowns, cancer—you name it.
For me, the health service was a godsend when my husband suffered a severe stroke in the s. He got exemplary critical care; I did not get a bill. A little over one in 10 Britons have some sort of private supplemental insurance; others pick and choose when to use the N. Told my husband needed a sophisticated blood test from a particular doctor, I telephoned her office, only to be told there was a four-month wait.
And so it went. When it came time for my husband to undergo physical rehabilitation, I went to look at the facility offered by the N. The treatment was first rate, I was told, but the building was dismal: grim, dusty, hot, understaffed, housing 8 to 10 elderly men per ward. The food was inedible.
The place reeked of desperation and despair. Then I toured the other option, a private rehabilitation hospital with air-conditioned rooms, private bathrooms and cable televisions, a state-of-the-art gym, passably tasty food and cheery nurses who made a cup of cocoa for my husband every night before bed.
We chose the private hospital, where the bills would be paid in their entirety by insurance. My husband lived there for nearly two months. We saw the other patients only when they were in the gym for treatment when my husband was. Most of them seemed to be from rich countries in the Middle East. Perhaps they were the only ones who could afford to pay. I will refrain from personal attacks and hope that you can do the same.
My wife lived in England for 3 years.
- “Get ready for the gauntlet”?
- (Read ebook) Te odio, te quiero: Las relaciones entre padres e hijos?
- se apañan aviones de papel (Spanish Edition).
- Twisted Wrap - Crochet Pattern?
- Partner to the Poor: A Paul Farmer Reader (California Series in Public Anthropology).
- a May Day anthology.
In that time, she experienced British care from 2 perspectives. The first as a traveling student with the more primitive care and the second as a student at Cambridge, where the well-to-do send their offspring.follow link
Surviving the Gauntlet
Guess which one was better? For example, when my wife had a cold under the primitive option, they gave her aspirin and sent her home.
However, when it comes to major illness or injury, or recuperative care, as the article you posted cites, it stinks unless you have purchased additional coverage. Your author readily admits to using private coverage and that 1 in 10 persons in England can afford to do this hence my citing the op-ed piece. She also states that when her friend died, she was spared the expense of tens of thousands of dollars of debt. That is her opinion, and if she is a writer, and not in the health or insurance profession, I take her opinion on this matter with a grain of salt.
Moreover, if I was dying, I would want the drugs, even if it added a few days to my life. But the greater good is all that counts, right? Tort reform would prevent much of the unnecessary testing, but what about the times when a doctor or specialist cannot find out immediately what her patient is suffering from? Both were or are young college age and 6 yrs old. This is age-based discrimination when it comes to allocating limited funds for health care.
Its okay, until you are the old person getting discriminated against. Will you, or are you naive enough to believe the propaganda and risk not only your life but of those you love on speculation? It is when the major illness or injury part comes in that we are far superior.
Slashing welfare is a recipe for crime
I disagree with your statement that it is when profit is involved that waste comes in. It is the exact opposite as shown by any government run agency or jokes about union workers. My response to Sepulveda included the many basic reasons for my opposition. BDD, Thank you for admitting that you have a personal financial interest in the insurance industry.
- Pacific Research Institute | Health Care Books.
- Ich bin stärker!: Mein Leben mit dem Krebs! (German Edition).
- Chapter Three. Discord At Home: The Ruptured Family In Postwar Fiction!
- Shop by category.
- Surviving the Gauntlet: An Ideology of a Drug Afflicted Family.
- Hooked on Growth: Economic Addictions and the Environment.
I do, as I offer every form of insurance and investments to my clients. In all likelihood, if one does happen, it will probably increase my income because so few will know all the particulars that I will be in even greater demand. My only concern with the healthcare debate is as a consumer and not as an investor of which I own no stocks in the healthcare industry or as an employee my company sold its healthcare unit 15 years ago.
Health care is the most difficult public policy problem there is. Substantively, the system has been cobbled together with duct tape for 40 years, so tweaking costs in one area could easily cause another part of the system to fall apart. But unlike flag burning, for example, health care actually affects your life. I do know that the current health system is not something that any sane person would have designed from scratch. As the health care debate swirls around us, here are seven questions designed to illuminate that discussion:. By accident. This is not a system that Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson planned over months of meetings in Philadelphia.
His administration forbade wage increases; clever employers offered workers free health care instead.
When lawyers and judges are uninformed, the results can be harmful.
Ever after, health insurance was attached to employment in the U. If we had a Canadian-style system or British or French , would you give it up for what you have now? They do. Imagine that you were in a country that guaranteed coverage, where health care costs are 25 percent to 40 percent less, where life expectancy is higher; and where the costs of the system are not imposed directly on businesses. Now suppose that a politician stood up and proposed scrapping all of that and the admitted flaws of those systems and replacing it with the U. What are your preferred benchmarks for quality in a health care system, and how does the U.
Any reasonable indicators should measure how healthy we are, not how we get that way. The most pathetic thing about the current health care debate is the ideological obsession with government involvement. We expect a complete recovery.
What we should care about is the outcome, not who is paying for it. How healthy are we? How long are we living? What is happening to our survival rates for different diseases? Are we providing patients with the most appropriate and cost-effective care? Do Americans have access to good care in a timely manner? We should care about whether government involvement improves health outcomes or not. To the United States. The U. I suspect that the rest of the world is free-riding on that to some extent. In fact, many wealthy Canadians come to the U. But here is the wrinkle in the King Hussein story. He flew to Minnesota for treatment, not Miami or L.
Why is that relevant? Because Minnesota is one of the places in the U. Physicians are paid a salary, rather than being compensated based on the quantity of procedures and tests they provide.
Surviving the Gauntlet : An Ideology of a Drug Afflicted Family - cepfootstrophimut.ga
The incentives are different. The costs are lower. And the outcomes are excellent. Good enough for a king, literally. The same politicians who rail against government involvement in health care almost always extol the virtues of Medicare.
Related Surviving the Gauntlet : An Ideology of a Drug Afflicted Family
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved